Author: admin

  • Is Seven Your Lucky Number?

    Is Seven Your Lucky Number?

    These seven events will shape the end of year investment climate.

    The week ahead is among the most important of the year.  Rarely is there this type of confluence of events in a short time that will have far-reaching implications for investors known ahead of time as well as discussed so extensively.  One implications of this is the market discount of expectations.

    The potential for sharp price gyrations and the dictates of money management should not draw attention away from from the big picture and the durable trends.  In this context, there are two important considerations long-term investors ought to keep in mind.

    First, the divergence in the trajectories of economic policy has not peaked, or even come close to a peak.  When we agree this is the main car owner in the foreign exchange market, then assume further dollar appreciation on the trend basis.  There has been a dramatic re-build of long dollar positions since mid-October.  The late momentum traders are vulnerable at that time ahead.  It may occur after this week's events, or it might be after the FOMC meeting later within December.  Such a shakeout may supply long-term investors with a new opportunity to placement with the underlying trend.

    Second, while all Fed tightenings do not lead to a dollar rally, the Reagan dollar rally and the Clinton dollar rally (the previous two significant dollar rallies since the end of Bretton Woods) were preceded by Fed rate hikes.  Recall Volcker's hikes prior to the 1980 election assisted set the stage for that dollar rally that ultimately lift the greenback more than 50% on a real trade-weighted basis before coordinated G7 intervention reversed it.

    The Given raised rates in 94′.  This, combined with a new Treasury Assistant that promised not to make use of the dollar as a trade tool, spurred the five-year Clinton dollar rally.  It too ultimately ended with the help of coordinated intervention within October 2000.

    Here is a thumbnail sketch of next week's seven key events:

    1.  China's November May readings:   Expectations little altered.  The manufacturing economy likely slowed while the service field continues to expand.  The economic climate is transitioning away from production so the traditional go-to metrics, like railroad car loadings, electrical usage, and bank loans, were selected by Premier Li at an earlier stage of development.  Marketplace impact is likely to be minimal.  The actual China stock and relationship markets are trading on another dynamic than the macroeconomic condition.  The actual equity market posted an impressive loss before the weekend, but the global knock-on effect seemed minimum and the US S&P 500 eked out a small gain.  Frequently negative economic surprises through China weigh on item producers including the Australian buck.

    2.  IMF's SDR decision:   It seems like the forgone conclusion now that the IMF will include the yuan in the next configuration of the SDR, which will be implemented in September 2016.  Assuming this is a reasonable assume, the real question is about the weighting from the yuan.  This is very much unknown partly because, as the IMF is the very first to admit, it is not a mechanical choice.  There is a large judgment component.  The literature suggests the IMF's own approach continues to be evolving toward more weight upon capital markets than the market for goods (exports).  In addition, the other currencies in the SDR are substantially more accessible and used than the yuan. 

    If just relying on China's exports, the IMF staff suggested in the summer, the weighting of 14-16%. Many observers seemed to have taken this illustration from context, and this became the tough consensus of what will be announced.  We are less sanguine.  From China's point of view, the key now is getting into, not the weight.  That is high is scope for give up with those who think that yuan isn’t seasoned sufficiently, and much more work has to be done to increase the part of markets in setting key elements of the price of profit China. In addition, there is discomfort with the light capital regulates that China has imposed to deter capital outflows.

    We expect the marketplace impact to be minimal.  We don’t expect central banks to instantly begin buying yuan.  Macroeconomic considerations nevertheless favor some depreciation within the yuan, though the large trade surplus and the shift away from manufacturing argue against a significant depreciation.  The gap between the onshore (CNY) and just offshore (CNH) yuan widened in recent times.  The IMF had indicated over the summer that this was not desired.  The gap has approached amounts at which officials appeared to consider indirect action.  The may also be arbitrage opportunities for large Chinese banking institutions.

    3.  Reserve Bank of Australia policy decision:    The chances of an interest rate cut this week are very small, but the risk that the Two.0% cash rate is the bottom of the interest rate cycle has increased following the unexpectedly large falling Q3 capital expenditures.  The 9.2% decrease was three-times larger than the Bloomberg general opinion forecast, and it is more than twice the drop seen in Q2 (-4.4%).  It had been the fourth consecutive quarterly decline during which time capex has fallen through more than a fifth.  The changeover in China is helping to make a transition in Australia.

    The combination of low interest rates and a depreciating forex (-15.6% over the past 12 months) is assisting the transition.  Barring an unexpected cut, which would likely send the currency back towards $0.7000, Governor Stevens' statement will likely form the market's reaction.  Before the capex data, he was obvious that the RBA was on maintain into Q1 16.  We think the RBA likely tell investors that there’s scope to cut rates again if needed.   The market may see this an increasing the likelihood of a rate within Q1 16.

    4.  Bank of Canada policy decision:  The risk of a Bank of Canada price cut is also low, but the two rate cuts earlier this year may need to have a follow up within Q1 next year.  Recall that based on the monthly GDP figures, the Canadian economy contracted from last November through May.  The 0.4% expansion within June was the quickest speed that was achieved, and since after that growth has been decelerating (0.3% in July and 0.1% within August. The economy expects to have stagnated in September, which will be reported on Dec 4, two days after the Bank of Canada meeting.

    The loss of economic momentum as the 1 / 4 proceeded may be more important than the Q3 figures reported at the same time (Bloomberg consensus forecast is 2.3% annualized).  Canada's jobs data before the weekend break are expected to be soft following an outsized rise in October (44k), however the fate of the Canadian buck is likely to be driven by the next three events. 

    5.  ECB policy choice:   Even though there is great uncertainty about precisely what the ECB will do, anticipations for additional action seems almost universal.  There appear to be four moving parts:  the deposit rate, the pace of buys, the instruments that can be bought, and the duration of the program.  Each has been the subject of much discussion.  When there is a specific consensus, it seems that it’s for a six-month extension of the plan until March 2017.

    On one hands, it may be the least significant motion because the current September 2016 termination was always soft.  However, it may be significant in that in confirms that the divergence of monetary coverage may persist, which in turn suggests the question of how much continues to be and can be discounted. 

    There had been reports that the ECB was considering buying sub-sovereign ties and non-performing loans.  We are extremely skeptical of the latter and suspect that in these discussions, having chits one can sacrifice is helpful.  We doubt that sub-sovereign ties will be included.  Sufficient openness may be lacking.  However, enhancing the agencies whose debt can be purchased appears to be an ongoing process. 

    The ECB recently raised the cap upon any one issue that can be bought.  While there is a limit on liquidity reasons, it shows that the ECB can revise its self-imposed rules.  For instance, there has been some suggestion in order to waive entirely the deposit rate as the floor with regard to yields that can be bought under the asset purchase program. 

    The deposit rate currently sits at without 20 bp.  Previously Draghi had indicated that at this rate, monetary policy had been exhausted.  However, other countries showed that where ever the limit to unfavorable interest rates was, it was not Twenty bp.  More recently, Draghi (and others) have indicated that a lower deposit rate could still be helpful.  The actual OIS market appears to be pricing within a 5-7 bp cut in the deposit rate while studies suggest the market is divided in between 10 and 20 bp cut a slight majority in the lower end.  

    There has been some dialogue that the ECB is considering applying a two-tiered system similar to the 1 used in Denmark.  At first we thought this would penalize the large banking institutions (especially from Germany and France), but it may be interpreted in such a way that it allows a somewhat less "penalty" to banks with large deposits.  This may assist minimize the disruptive effect in the money markets. 

    Lastly, numerous expect the pace of purchases to be accelerated.  A common forecast is for an increase of Twenty bln euros a month to Eighty bln.  If this does materialize and starts in January, and also the program is extended by six months, this amounts to increasing the purchases to 1.Two trillion euros.  Under the existing program, the ECB would buy 60 bln euros for the first nine months of the coming year, or 540 bln euros.  This expectation has helped drive Eurozone yields lower in recent weeks.  It makes us more circumspect on the amount of bonds that can be freed up for purchases by a lower deposit rate. 

    Even though the anticipation of action this week offers driven the euro lower, it may sell-off further on the news.  Very first, it is difficult to say with any confidence precisely what has already been reduced.  Second, despite the clear record of Draghi's tenure at the helm of the ECB, the market has repeatedly underestimated him.  He has repeatedly surprised on the dovish side. Note that Draghi speaks the next day at the NY Economic Club.   The third reason why profit-taking on short euro positions may be limited is because of the next key event.

    6.  US work data:  This month's jobs report takes on extra special which means.  Barring a shockingly poor report, this report is the last hurdle to an FOMC decision later on December 16 to deliver the much-anticipated rate hike.  The most important thing to know about the employment report is that no one expects a repeat of the 271k increase in October nonfarm payrolls.  It was the best of the year. The every week jobless claims also point to some payback.  The consensus is for around 200k.  It would most likely 30k-50k for the pendulum of market emotion to swing very far, particularly if some of the internals, like average by the hour earnings, the unemployment, as well as under-employment (U-6) is constructive. 

    Separately, we note that at the start of a new month, there’s a full slate of US financial reports, with the jobs report being the single most important one.  Also, we would draw your focus on US auto sales.  Even before the crisis, Americans rarely bought more than 18 mln vehicles (annualized pace) in a month.  Once they do occur, they look like one-month wonders.  Not only did Americans purchase 18.12 mln vehicles in September for the first time in a 10 years, but it looks to have repetitive the feat in Oct.    

    The Fed's Beige Book that will be released two days before the jobs data is unlikely to have much market impact.  The market appears convinced that the US economy keeps growing around trend (seen ~2%) despite the fact that personal consumption in Oct soft (reported last week at 0.1% vs. consensus associated with 0.3%).  The Atlanta Fed cut its GDPNowcast to 1.8% from 2.3% in Q4 following the statement. 

    There are no fewer than nine Federal Reserve officials that will speak for that week ahead. Yellen speaks several times, including at the Economic Club in Washington, and the Joint Economic Committee of Congress.  She is unlikely to break brand new ground.  Expect her in order to reiterate the progress that’s been made, and provide assurances that accommodation will be removed gradually. Fischer also speaks on Thursday at a conference on financial stability.  No doubt well-timed rate hikes are integral.  The regional presidents’ views are fairly well known at this point.  The only other Governor to speak is Brainard, and her views is going to be interesting given that she formerly was more comfortable with a later on lift-off.   

    7.  OPEC meeting:   Barring a decision to cut output, we expect oil prices to continue to trend lower. The market continues to perceive a glut.  US rig count has fallen 18% because the summer, and 54% since the maximum in October 2014, but All of us output is still running regarding 145k barrels a day more than this did a year ago.

    Many participants misunderstood the report that indicated that Saudi authorities were prepared to work with OPEC and non-OPEC producers to stabilize the market.  They thought this was a constructive development for prices.  The Saudis were softening their position.  Hardly.  Saudi Arabia was reiterating that there would be no unilateral cuts.  And since many OPEC as well as non-OPEC producers do not want or claim inability to cut production, the prospects for an agreement seem quite remote. 

    There has been pressure on the Saudi riyal peg to the dollar.  We expect the speculators to be proven wrong.  The economic challenge has been greater than now, and also the peg remained.  It is an anchor associated with stability for Saudi Arabia and also the world.  Every so often someone gets a bee in their bonnet about testing the durability of one of the rare currency pegs to the dollar.   To their own detriment, such participants possess repeatedly underestimated the Saudi Arabia's will. 

    The same may be accurate regarding the oil market.  It must be assumed that Saudi Arabia is actually pursuing a long-term strategy it realized would have near-term costs.  Have the costs been substantially a lot more than anticipated?  Is there a way to evaluate the strategy and assess the possibility of success? 

    The answers, of course, are beyond the scope of this be aware, but the strategy is hardly a years old.  Saudi Arabia's exports to the US are at two-month highs.  Saudi Arabia recently increased its competition with Spain in Europe.  Competition within Asia remains fierce.  The declines in energy expense have been brutal and will effect in the medium term. 

    Finally, we note if there is a change in the OPEC quota, rather than a cut, don't be surprised if there is an increase.  The increase may come as a surprise to many.  The market is vulnerable to headline danger. However, the issue may not be what it seems.  First, Indonesia, which had left OPEC rejoined.  It produces about 880k barrels a day.  This could prompt a 1 mln barrel increase in OPEC output, which essentially transfers from non-OPEC.  Through not impacting supply, theoretically it should not impact prices. 

    The second issue is Iran's oil.  How will OPEC manage this?  If the overall quota is not adjusted, that will mean that other members' output would need to be cut to make room for Iranian oil.  Even if the political climate was less antagonistic, it is difficult to examine this taking place. 

    Seven Events Next Week that will Shape the Investment Weather conditions are republished with permission from Marc in order to Market

  • India's BJP not Feeling the Love in Bihar Election

    India's BJP not Feeling the Love in Bihar Election

    Indian state Bihar sends a message to Modi's ruling party.

    As the Hindi saying goes:  If you reside in the water, do not make an opponent of the crocodile.

    The ruling party in India, the BJP, was conquered in the Bihar state assembly elections.  The actual party came out with 59 chairs out of 243, down 35 chairs from the previous elections and substantially worse than expected.  Many were looking at the Bihar elections as a referendum associated with sorts on Modi’s very first 17 months in power. 

    Much of the debate in Bihar revolved around the national debate more than Modi’s perceived hard collection against Muslims and political dissent, made even more salient by the death of four Muslims supposedly attacked through mobs of Hindus.  Now the bad results will set the tone for that multiple subsequent elections that will adhere to, emboldening the opposition, and raising serious questions about the BJP marketing campaign strategy.  Perhaps Modi will soften up his tone as well as sound more conciliatory towards the Hindu-Muslim tensions, but it may be too late in order to reshape his image.

    More objectively, regional elections matters because the make up of the state assemblies determines party representation in the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House.  In addition, it is presently there that the opposition is blocking the government.  Now the focus becomes back to implementation – the age-old condition in India.  Despite good motives, it is becoming harder to see how Modi will be able to push through their reformist agenda.  Recent defeats possess included the nationwide products or services tax and land change.

    All that said India still has several positives going for it.  Rajan in the helm of the central bank will still be a solid anchor for the country’utes macroeconomic management and banking field reform.  Oil prices from these levels are very favourable for the country’s external account.  The election results are not enough to completely counter our relatively favourable view, but it definitely curbs our enthusiasm.  At the minimum, it means that Modi will have to take more time and energy on campaigning and less on pushing economic reforms.  It also may mean that he will need to refocus his priorities towards addressing social tensions.

    Indian assets prices reacted accordingly, however INR suffered the most. After starting down 2.3%, the Sensex recovered to close down only 0.5%.  Local swap rates had been up as much as 12 british petroleum, back to levels seen in late September, undoing the fall in yields that followed the more-aggressive-than-expected 50 british petroleum cut by the RBI on September 29.  USD/INR gapped higher to Sixty six.45 – less than 1% from September highs and 3.5% from Sept 2013 all-time highs.

    India Election Outcomes Sours the Mood is republished with authorization from Marc to Market

  • Global Currency Movement and other Economic News

    Global Currency Movement and other Economic News

    Currencies move among economic news and events

    For many investors, today marks the end of the year, but it is finishing on a favorable note. The mixture of the FOMC meeting and the SNB adoption of negative interest rates underscored the actual dollar and equity bullish divergence theme. 

    It struck us that too many people were doing all kinds of mental and verbal gymnastics to account for what was a technical move. The correction, which came after a strong six-week trend move, lasted a week, December 9-16. The S&P 500 and also the Dow Jones Stoxx 600 possess both recouped around 70% of this downdraft.

    The euro peaked near $1.2570 upon December 16 and has not really been able to resurface above $1.2300 for nearly 24-hours. The SNB’s move, effective the same day the ECB’s meeting, The month of january 22, is no coincidence. Just like the market is feeling more confident inside a rate hike by the Given near mid-2015, it is feeling well informed of a broader asset plan from the ECB. The euro is actually holding above the low focused on December 8 just below $1.2250. In the thinning holiday markets, techniques may be exaggerated, but now it appears asymmetrically so to the downside.

    The dollar peaked against the yen on Dec 8 near JPY121.85. The violent correction ended in entrance of JPY115.50, a key technical retracement level of the dollar’s advance from both October 15 as well as October 31. The JPY119.Fifty high the dollar documented today corresponds to a 61.8% retracement of the dollar’s decline over the past 7 days. A move above there would advise a return to the highs and beyond.  

    Ironically, today’s dollar increases against the yen come as BOJ Governor Kuroda appeared to express concern about the pace of the recent moves.  It was practically a forgone conclusion that the BOJ wouldn’t alter policy or break new ground at it’s last meeting of the year.  The actual Nikkei gapped higher yesterday and today.  The index closed on it’s high and now appears ready to test the December 8 high that is just above 18000. 

    Sterling is uninspired.  It is caught between your strength of the dollar and also the weakness of the euro (as well as Swiss franc).  Since mid-November, sterling has been limited to a $1.56-$1.58 trading range.  There have been a handful of violations of the two-cent range, but it has mostly held.  The euro has been around a wider range.  Since September, it has been peaking in the GBP0.8000-50 area and bottoming in the GBP0.7800 area.  The divergence between the UK and dinar area will widen.  Nevertheless, political uncertainty, especially with the actual Scottish Nationals indicating they are prepared to cut a deal with Labour, may detract from sterling’s advantage.  Meanwhile, the FTSE recouped 61.8% of its weeklong decrease. 

    Incorporating the latest census data to determine economic activity, China revised how big its economy upward at the end of last year.  The 3.4% increase is CNY58.8 trillion.  To put that into perspective, consider it roughly the size of the Singapore’s Gross domestic product.  This is the first step of the procedure.   The next step is to adopt the worldwide standards regarding methodology, that China has signaled it will early next year.  This will likely boost estimations of the size of China’s economy another 3-5%.  One consequence of such revisions is that it makes evaluations to GDP, such as debt/GDP or current account surplus/GDP marginally smaller.  We suspect there is little coverage implications in the changed optics. 

    On the other hand, the PBOC has taken actions to ease the liquidity squeeze within the interbank market.  It has injected an unspecified amount of liquidity through the Pledged Supplementary Lending facility and contains fully rolled over the MLF funds (CNY 500 bln three month financial loans) that were maturing.  The flurry of year-end IPOs in China has started, and between yesterday as well as December 25, there are approximately dozen IPOs that are tying upward over CNY3 trillion (~$480 bln).  Getting beyond the IPOs, with no repos expiring next week, many anticipate the liquidity squeeze to help ease. The 7-day repo rate, which is a helpful metric of interbank liquidity, jumped 154 bp today (213 bp around the week) to almost 6.0%.  The actual PBOC preferred to keep it below 4%.  

    The Shanghai Amalgamated rose 1.7%, led by telecoms and utilities.  This can be a new four-year high.  Since the PBOC surprised investors by cutting the actual benchmark rate on The fall of 21, the Shanghai Composite has rallied almost 25%.  Its correction survived two days (December 8-9), and has already been recovering since. 

    Canada reports CPI as well as retail sales today.  The consensus expects a 0.2% decline in headline inflation and a 0.1% rise in the core rate.  The main bank expects price pressures to ease.  The surprise may be in retail sales.  The headline is expected to be 0.3% lower after a 0.8% rise in October.  There is scope for an upside surprise.  Excluding autos, retail sales are expected to increase slightly after a flat studying previously.   

    The divergence theme weighs around the Canadian dollar, which continues to be treated like as petrol currency.  The US dollar has found good support this week near CAD1.1560.  The commodity intensive Greater toronto area Stock Composite has rallying highly in recent day, but has generally under-performed.  The highs for the year were at the begining of September.

    The Santa Rally Underpins the Dollar is republished along with permission from Marc to Market

  • Bullish Dollar Bets Paying Off Again

    Bullish Dollar Bets Paying Off Again

    Investors bullish on the dollar are again on the right side of the trade

    The powerful divergence theme re-emerged and effectively ended the dramatic correction throughout the capital markets. The FOMC statement strengthened conviction of a mid-2015 lift off, even if the speed of tightening may be somewhat slower than previously anticipated. At the same time, the Swiss National Lending institution’s decision to move to unfavorable interest rates, partly in anticipation of the actual ECB expanding its asset buys as early as next month, underscores that Europe remains well at the rear of the US in the credit cycle.

    Rather than attribute the downdraft within the dollar and equity marketplaces to a shift in underlying basic drivers, we had seen the actual hand of a technical modification, driven by short-term market placement, and aggravated by year-end portfolio adjustments.  Indeed the dinar peaked within a few ticks of the 50% retracement objective of its deficits from the October 15 high near $1.29. For its component, the dollar’s dramatic slide against the yen stopped just timid of a key retracement objective of their rally from both Oct 15 and October Thirty-one found near JPY115.50.

    We anticipate the dollar’s higher trend to carry on.  However, the lack of participation within the next two weeks could imprecise this trend.  The Dollar Index made a new high before the weekend near 89.65.  A move above 90.00, which has held back previous dollar bounces since the start of the Great Financial Crisis, would signal an acceleration of the dollar’s advance.  The 88.Eighty area is Initial assistance.   

    The euro recorded a new reduced for the move just before the weekend near $1.2220.  A break of $1.2200 would suggest losses towards $1.20.  It has not had the opportunity to resurface much over $1.2300 since breaking below in response to the SNB’s decision. 

    Technical indicators suggest the dollar’s uptrend against the yen will resume.  The move above JPY119.50 strengthens the conviction that the greenback obtained care of back to the December Eight high near JPY121.85 as well as beyond.  Initial dollar assistance is in the JPY118.50-80 area. 

    Sterling is not especially interesting now, caught between your strength of the dollar and the weakness of other currencies, including the euro, Swiss franc, yen and Australian dollars.  Against the greenback, a $1.56-$1.58 trading range since mid-November represents it’s confinement.  There have been a handful of violations of the two-cent range.  Technical indicators recommend risk remains to the downside.  Sterling set a low near $1.5540 upon December 17, but the click back into the range seemed halfhearted.  Resistance is seen $15680-$1.5700.      

    The dollar-bloc currencies are heading lower.  They did not participate in the bounce that the euro and yen enjoyed.  Resistance in the Aussie dollar is near $0.8200.  Our next important target is actually near $0.8000, ahead of which are the lows from 2010 around $0.8060-70.  The US dollar reached a high of roughly CAD1.1675 upon December 15.  This was towards the lower end of the range we have been suggesting for the greenback.  The upper end of that variety is near CAD1.1725.  Since documenting the highs, the US buck has not been below CAD1.1560. 

    The dollar peaked against the Mexican peso on Dec 12 near MXN14.95.  Five days later, it had slumped to MXN14.37.  By the end of the week, the dollar’s bull move have had recovered to over MXN14.70.  In the days ahead, the dollar may consolidate it’s gains.  It could pull back toward MXN14.50, though, over the moderate term, it appears the dollar can retest the 2009 high close to MXN15.60.  

    The US 10-year yield bounced off the 2.0% level to near 2.25%, where the rally faded.  Economic data out in a few days expects to show stronger capex (long lasting goods orders) and more powerful growth momentum (upward modification to Q3 GDP to above 4%).  This may limit the pullback in yields.

    At the same time, we observe that the premium the US pays over Germany widened out to almost 160 bp now.  This is the largest premium because mid-1999.  It began the year close to 110 bp.  The widening was a result of German bund produces falling further than US produces fell.  

    Although the US 10-year yield continues to be relatively low, the 2-year deliver has firmed, and at 65 british petroleum is 1-2 bp below the five-year high set earlier this month.  The US high quality over German at this tenor is about 73 bp, which represents a new three-year high.  These relative rate of interest developments are constructive for the dollar.

    The S&P 500 gapped higher December 18 following a powerful close the previous day after the FOMC meeting and seemingly aided by the Switzerland National Bank’s move to negative interest rates.  It had advanced further before the weekend.   In the mid-week low to the pre-weekend high, the actual S&P 500 gained about 95 points or 5.2%.

    That gap is between 2016.Seventy five and 2018.98.  We do not search for this gap to fill in the near-term.  Rather the gap, like the one on October 21, signals the end to the corrective losses and the resumption of the bull advance that carries it to new highs.

    There is a reasonable chance that the February oil futures contract has put in a short-term low around $54.30-60.  The RSI is turning up, and the MACD is about to mix. The sellers were tugging back, and bargain searching reported.   The $60.00 degree is the first hurdle and near $63.00. 

    Observations based on the speculative positioning in the futures market:

    1.  There was only one significant placement adjustment of more than 10k within the latest CFTC Commitment of Investors report for the week finishing December 16.  It was the 12.4k contract reduction in the gross short euro position, leaving 182k contracts still short.  The net short position is smaller by 52k contracts since peaking in early November, which is accounted by short covering.  

    2.  There were other gross currency positions which changed by almost 10,000 contracts.  The short yen placement fell by 9.6k agreements to 132.6k.  The gross lengthy Swiss franc position doubled in order to 18.9k.  The speculative yucky long Australian dollar position increased by 9.4k contracts to 26.8k.  

    3.  All the forex futures we track here but the Canadian dollar saw gross short positions trimmed in the latest week.  This seems very much consistent with squaring up ahead of the holiday season.  For its component, the gross short Canadian dollar position rose the by 300 contracts.  

    4.  The speculative net short All of us 10-year Treasury futures position increased by 20% to 258k contracts.  Liquidation was a complete 10% of the gross long position, or 32.3k contracts offered to leave 273.4k still long.  The gross short position elevated by 24.6k contracts raising the short position at 531.6k agreements.  It has risen by 70k contracts over the past three reporting weeks. Over the same period, the actual gross long position offers fallen by 110k contracts.

    Dollar Bulls Get back Upper Hand is republished with authorization from Marc to Market

  • EMU Inflation Data Likely Ups the Aggression Factor in ECB Action

    EMU Inflation Data Likely Ups the Aggression Factor in ECB Action

    The lack of European inflation means broader ECB action.

    The anticipation is nearly over.  The actual softer than expected original EMU inflation figures encourages expectations for the more aggressive selection of actions by the ECB tomorrow.  Draghi has claimed that movement toward the actual inflation target was too slow.  Today's data showed a 0.1% increase year-over-year in the heading rate.  The market had predicted a 0.2% increase.  Even though the ECB targets headline inflation, it clearly also tracks core inflation.  Core price raises slowed to 0.9% through 1.1%.

    The anticipation is almost in the US as well.  The November employment report is the last hurdle to a mid-December Fed backpack. Although the ADP estimate has a few tracking error with the BLS estimation, and there have been some significant divergence in some months, an as expected increase of 190k jobs might strengthen expectations that slack in the labor market continues to be absorbed. 

    The market has largely shrugged away yesterday's dismal US production ISM.  The 48.6 reading was the first below the 50 boom/bust level since late 2012 and was the lowest since ’09.  It was so poor that it offset the somewhat larger than expected increase in construction spending (One.0% vs 0.6%), and prompted the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow to cut its Q4 growth tracker to at least one.4% from 1.8%.

    On the other hand, US November auto sales were the third month over 18 mln unit annual pace.  Barring a major disappointment in December 2015 is set to be a record year of sales, edging out the previous peak in Two thousand at 17.4 mln vehicles.  Americans bought roughly a million more vehicles this year over 2014.  Yet most think the news is to be too good to end up being sustainable, and they are building a few slowing into next year’s forecasts. 

    Sterling had been resilient in the face of yesterday's disappointing UK production PMI.  However, this seemed to be more a reflection of the common corrective pressure on the US dollar.  Sterling is heavier today following the disappointing construction PMI, even though it is a smaller part of the economy than manufacturing.  The construction May fell to 55.Three from 58.8.  The marketplace anticipated a smaller pullback.  It is the poorest report since April.  The services PMI reports tomorrow.

    The euro upticks ran out of steam near $1.0640 and with the disappointing inflation report was sold-off back below $1.06.  Large option positions at both $1.06 and $1.05 end today, the day before the ECB meeting.  Initially the $1.0560 area should offer support.  The recent design has been for some profit taking to follow new euro lows. 

    Yesterday's high for sterling near $1.5125 seems like a long time ago.  It exchanged nearly a cent lower following the disappointing construction PMI.  Moving above $1.5080 would stabilize the actual technical tone and avoid a test on the recent reduced just below $1.50. 

    The yen is actually unflappable.  The dollar remains within the range set on Monday approximately JPY122.60 to JPY123.35.  Stronger US bond yields and an uptick in the S&P 500 may keep the dollar firm from the yen.

    The Australian dollar remains the market's favorite.  It is the only major currency to have acquired against the greenback over the past month (~2.5%).  A little more than half of that came this week (~1.4%).  The RBA'utes recognition of improvement within the non-mining part of the economy aided this, and some improving data, such as Q3 GDP (0.9% vs Zero.8% consensus), rising exports, and building approvals.  We continue to view the upticks as corrective in nature.  It’s approached technical resistance close to $0.7350.  A break of this area, that seems unlikely today, blocking a disappointing ADP estimate in america, could spur a move towards $0.7400 were stronger offers are believed to lay.

    In addition to the ADP estimate, the North American morning additionally features the Bank of North america meeting.  The large (0.5%) shrinkage in the September GDP offset the fact that Canada snapped the two-quarter contraction in Q3.  The exploration, drilling quarrying sector contracted Five.1% in September, suggesting which Canada is still struggling with the commodity shock.  The unpredicted US crude oil inventory develop (API 1.6 mln barrel increase) weighed down the Canadian buck.  If there is a risk with the Financial institution of Canada, we suspect it may be on the dovish side, although not rate cut, of course.  Canada, like the US reviews November jobs data on Friday.  It expects in order to report a net loss of work.  The US dollar is poised to make new multi-year highs from the Canadian dollar in the future.

    There are several Federal Reserve officials talking today, but the key is Yellen’s speech shortly after midday in the Washington DC Economic Club.  Expect her to stick to the piece of software, which means a reiteration of the Oct FOMC statement.  Still the market is going to be sensitive to any deviation.  Late the Beige Book when preparing for the mid-month FOMC meeting will report.  It typically is not a market mover.

    The Wait is Nearly Over, and the Dollar Catches a Bid is republished with permission through Marc to Market

  • Low Commodity Prices Threaten the Congo

    Low Commodity Prices Threaten the Congo

    The DRC grew by 9% in 2014, but low commodity prices could end the fun.

    Many African countries have in recent years, shown phenomenal economic development. However, recent developments on global markets – including the stop by prices of commodities for example oil, copper, and cobalt – have raised questions about the sustainability of Africa’s economic growth.

    The lack of stability of global market has lowered investors’ confidence, and led to questions about the health of the global market. There is a feeling of uncertainty and fears of financial global crises, particularly due to a slowdown in China’s economy.

    Many countries around the world, including the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are feeling the impact of the fall in commodity costs, particularly minerals. The drop in the price of copper hit the actual DRC. Glencore, the Anglo-Swiss multinational commodity buying and selling and mining company based in Baar, Switzerland, is considering closing some of its procedures in Katanga province.

    Agriculture, mineral resources, manufacturing and services pushes the DRC’s economy. In the last decade, the agricultural sector has been declining as the country’s major contributor to its GDP while commodities-related industries have been increasing. The mining sector makes up about one-quarter of the country’s GDP.

    Last year the economy grew through nearly 9%, driven by the extractive as well as manufacturing industries, agriculture, commerce and construction, and a higher export demand for raw material. The dramatic fall in commodity prices threatens this particular growth.

    In addition, there are fears of increased political instability as President Joseph Kabila encounters accusations of attempting to remain within power beyond his second and last five-year term.

    According towards the IMF, the DRC:

    … remains a fragile country with vulnerabilities increasing.

    A shaking global economy with local impact

    Closing mines in the Katanga province would have a devastating impact, with severe social and economic consequences.

    Thousands of workers as well as their families depend on the mining industry. Mine closures would lead to large job losses. The company employs an estimated 5000 people in Katanga without counting subcontractors.

    New cities and communities have been established and sustained through mining. Smaller businesses have been created and new forms of commodities trade initiated by people living in areas surrounding the mines.

    The impact of exploration houses shrinking their procedures could cripple the DRC’utes economy, which is highly dependent on mineral exports. Up to 87.2% of the economy is export focused.

    According to the OECD, the DRC’s exports were worth US$7.03 billion within 2013, making it the 103rd-largest exporter in the world. Refined copper accounted for one-third of exports, followed by copper ore (19%), raw copper (7.5%), cobalt (8.8%), cobalt ore (6.9%), as well as crude petroleum 12%.

    The country thus remains extremely vulnerable to commodity prices, or to drops in demand for minerals. The question that needs responding to is how to avoid this permanent economic and social vulnerability?

    Diversification is key

    Many African countries, including the DRC have, for years maximised and concentrated their economic activities, a minimum of at the macro level, in only one sector.

    This lack of economic diversity and extreme concentration on 1 sector has never benefited the actual continent, and will never help the DRC. Diversification is key – not only with regard to GDP, but for local financial development, small businesses and business.

    In addition to this, the DRC depends on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), mainly financial investment, at the expense of nearby capital investment. The country shouldn’t be depending almost exclusively on FDI to run its economy. Rather, they should allow local as well as national companies to invest in proper sectors such as farming, agriculture, transport as well as mining.

    The federal government could add other guidelines. These include:

    * The DRC should motivate and stimulate local expense and they should support startup businesses. Many of the economic or even financial challenges that the DRC offers known for many years link to financial dependency. It is imperative that the government creates a friendly environment for citizens to invest in their own communities and get all the necessary support to establish and boost their businesses in a safe financial space.

    * The country must speed up local economic inclusion through tapping into the potential of the casual market. Women and youth within the informal sector conduct many of small trades. These folks constitute a class of casual entrepreneurs who, if backed financially and with the necessary abilities and logistics, would be able to grow the economy and produce more jobs.

    * Strengthen interprovincial economic activities and integration according to small-scale economic activity and trade.

    * Think about and promote the role and put of women in local economic development.

    It is important to mention that many efforts need deployment to insure sustainability, growth, as well as development of the DRC. Political stability and peace are also crucial for long-lasting economic growth and development.

    Why dependence on natural resources is bad for the DRC is republished with permission from The Conversation

    The Conversation

  • The Big Market News Week Lives Up to the Hype

    The Big Market News Week Lives Up to the Hype

    There is a lot to digest and not much of 2015 left.

    China joined the SDR, with a fat that puts it in third place behind the actual dollar and euro.  The actual ECB did ease policy. This delivered a 10 bp cut in the deposit rate (right now -30 bp), extended its asset purchase program for six months (to March 2017), broadened the range of assets that can be bought to include regional bonds, and declared motives to reinvest maturing proceeds.

    The All of us employment data removed what was perceived as the last potential challenge to Fed decision to hike rates later this month.  Not only was the actual headline number a little stronger than expected at 211k, nevertheless October jobs growth was revised to almost 300k. 

    The internals were also generally favorable though the underemployment (U-6) did tick up, but continues to be at its lowest level since 2008, except for October.  The breadth of job increases (industries) was the best within nine months.  The number of individuals quitting their jobs appears at a four-month high, and this coupled with labor shortages reported in the Beige Book, suggest reasonably good prospects for increased wage pressure.

    The markets have a excellent degree of uncertainty removed.  The BOJ balance sheet is expanding at an incredible clip associated with JPY80 trillion a year, and Governor Kuroda sees no compelling reasons up the ante further.  In fact, because of more recent data, especially funds expenditures, Japan's GDP, which contracted in Q3, is likely to be modified to show a little growth.  The actual ECB reviewed its monetary coverage and targets.  It made adjustments and barring a substantial shock, is unlikely to review it again until toward mid-2016. The financial institution of Canada and the Book Bank of Australia have recently reaffirmed their steady course.

    The Reserve Bank of New Zealand, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of England meet in the week ahead.  A Bloomberg survey found 15 of 18 economists expect the RBNZ to cut the cash rate by 25 bp, bringing it to 2.50%.   The vast majority expect this to become the last cut in the period.  We suspect there is a greater chance than suggested through the survey that the central bank stands pat.  Ideas that the RBA's neutral stance, the small move by the ECB, and elevated confidence of a Fed backpack, may steady the RBNZ's hand helped spur almost a 1% rise in the New Zealand dollar before the weekend. 

    Draghi, Constancio, and others at the ECB blame market participants for that second largest single day rally in the euro (the first being when the US announced QE within March 2009) and the razor-sharp backing up in interest rates.  Nevertheless, the Swiss National Bank was probably as surprised anyone.  The sense of urgency that Draghi seemed to express plus some trial balloons apparently launched, likely spurred SNB officials to prepare for that worst.  What was actually shipped, and the market's response, take pressure off the SNB from going further down the rabbit pit of unorthodox policy. 

    With the Swiss economy stagnating in Q3, deflationary demands (CPI -1.2% year-over-year in October), and list sales contracting in 9 of the first ten months of the year (year-over-year basis), a case can be made for easing monetary policy.  However, the sight-deposit target rate is currently minus 75 bp.  Neither is the currency exerting a lot pressure.  The franc was trading at five-year lows against the dollar before last week's correction.  Against the euro, the franc inside a lower range that has been set up since late August (for the euro, it is CHF1.0750-CHF1.1000).

    The Financial institution of England is the least likely to surprise.  Policy is on hold though there can always be one (and only 1) MPC member that is resisting, favoring the hike. There have been four macro-developments for that MPC to consider.  There has been a further stop by the price of oil.  There is more confidence that the Fed will hike rates this month.  The ECB eased. Sterling had valued 4% on a broad trade-weighted measure from the mid-October through mid-November.  The consolidation gave way to a pullback, leaving sterling still about 2% higher. 

    Earlier this year, there were times when the market seemed more confident of the BOE rate hike than a Fed hike.  Now it is quite a different story.  By the time the BOE provides its first hike, the actual Fed, even in a gradual setting, may lift the interest price target by 50-75 bp.  

    However, is really a December rate hike through the Fed a done offer?  How can the December Given funds futures, which Bloomberg yet others calculate to imply only a 74% chance, be reconciled with surveys that suggest 90% or more expect the hike?  The key is the assumption associated with where Fed funds average after lift-off.  Models assume that it will likely be in the middle of the Fed money range.  This need not be the situation.

    If the Fed wants to clarify the point of gradual tightening as well as maximize its control of extra reserves, it may choose to supply sufficient liquidity to keep the Fed funds rate underneath the middle of the target range.   If a person assumes that Fed funds will average 31.Five bp instead of 37.Five (the middle of the anticipated brand new range), a hike has been completely discounted.   Because of the risk that Fed funds do not average the middle of the range, the December Fed funds may not completely discount a hike under the conventional approach. 

    We dispute claims that the dollar's move is over because the divergence of monetary policy has all been discounted.   Consider that according to Bloomberg, the market has discounted a 40% chance of another hike in March.  Given the Fed has signaled, through it’s dot-plots, which will update in a couple of days that a hike once a 1 / 4 or every other meeting is projected to be appropriate, the risk seems greater and not just about all priced into the futures remove. 

    At the same time, the high frequency economic data due out in the coming days, including import prices, wholesale and business inventory figures, producer prices, and even list sales, is unlikely to impact either expectations for the Fed's 1st or 2nd rate hike.   An irony not lost on numerous participants last week was because Yellen and other Fed officials discussed their confidence in the expansion, the Atlanta Fed's GDPNowcast for Q4 has been halved to 1.5% in the last month.  

    Policymakers put more focus the signal generated from household final demand, accepting that the weak foreign growth and also the drag from the dollar's understanding are temporary. The drivers of the inventory cycle, which still has a strong influence on short-run growth, extend beyond monetary coverage.  Household consumption drives 2/3 from the economy and continues to broaden by 2.5%-3/0%.  Moreover, the effectiveness of consumption and services helps the economy weather the actual headwinds hitting the industrial sector. 

    Great uncertainty remains over the outlook for China's policy.  Now that it is in the SDR many expect Chinese language officials to intervene less on the currency, with some thinking that devaluation in August was just the "first bite of the cherry, the second bite is coming. Other people argue that foreign central banking institutions will begin boosting their yuan supplies soon, and this will provide the offset to the private capital outflows.   Addititionally there is speculation that China will raise the band in which it allows the dollar-yuan trade rate to move (2% from the central reference rate, or repair). 

    There is scope for the PBOC to ease monetary policy.  There are numerous financial reports that will be released in the days ahead.  Ironically, they are accepted with less cynicism than the GDP figures.  Of the reports, traders tend to watch the CPI as well as trade figures the closest.  The far east expects to report a record trade surplus, which is one of the arguments against a significant depreciation of the yuan.  Exports and imports are still getting on a year-over-year basis. 

    China's CPI continues to be stable this year.  It has averaged One.4% year-over-year through October, and it is likely to match it in November.  This means policy rates stay too high.   High reserve needs may have been a macro-prudential tool in a period of strong capital inflow, however 17.5% rate now appears ill-suited for a period of capital outflows.  Even if the precise timing may be impossible forecast with any confidence, the bottom of China's monetary cycle is not at hand. 

    What does this mean for that dollar?  The divergence of monetary policy remains very much in place, and that we think it is not fully priced in, and we wonder if it truly can be discounted.  We see the price action as an arguably long-over correction to a move that began in mid-October.   The extent of market position had left it vulnerable to a buy (dollar) rumor, sell the very fact even if the ECB had not disappointed.   

    Until we’re closer to the peak in the monetary divergence, the main dollar driver, it is not easy to call an end to the 3rd significant greenback rally since the end of Bretton Woods.  With regard to medium and long-term investors that broadly agree with this evaluation, this pullback in the dollar may be the kind of opportunity that has been awaited and anticipated.  That said, a dollar decline is the pain trade, but given the sharp move in US stocks in front of the weekend, recouping everything this lost in the previous day's ordeal, and then some, it is the holiday season as well as investors prefer pleasure in order to pain.

    This can make for choppy conditions and prevent a new pattern from emerging immediately. The actual dollar bulls have been scared (psychological) and scarred (material losses), and will be reluctant to jump back in immediately.  The bears might be more opportunistic than true believers and would want to squeeze much more bulls.  However, they do not want to overstay their own welcome, with a Fed backpack looming, and the low-hanging fruit–the weak dollar longs–have already been picked.

    After Gorging On Information, Time To Digest is republished with permission from Marc to Market

  • Could Currency and Funding Mismatches be on the Horizon?

    Could Currency and Funding Mismatches be on the Horizon?

    China's swap lines expose misunderstandings about their use

    The quarterly report by the Bank for International Settlements does not express it in so many words, but its warning of possible currency and funding mismatches illustrates the reason why the much ballyhooed Chinese swap lines are misunderstood. 

    Recall that during worst of the Great Financial Crisis in 2008-2009, there was no G7 currency intervention.  Instead, officials recognized the main problem was not foreign currency prices per se, but the use of dollar funding.  The Federal Reserve responded accordingly and established currency swap lines with a several countries to make buck funding available through nationwide central banks.  These swap lines were used to different degrees.  The swap outlines for the ECB, BOJ, BOE, BOC, and SNB were changed into permanent structures of the worldwide architecture in the form of standby agreements at the end of 2013.  Although the exchange lines, and now standby contracts, were bilateral, the US never used the ability. 

    Chinese officials saw the US exchange lines and erroneously believed this was part of the US initiatives to re-impose a dollar-centric order.  These people responded by extending their very own network of currency exchange agreements.  Barring a single exclusion, they have not been drawn on.  Yet, it has not avoided observers from claiming these people represent the internationalization of the yuan.  

    In the actual BIS quarterly report released over the weekend, authorities warn that a continued appreciation of the dollar will squeeze many corporations from emerging market economies.  There are two stations by which this will happen.  First, many of these businesses issued bonds denominated in foreign currencies, especially US dollars.  The BIS estimates such entities experienced issued $2.6 trillion of these obligations, of which three-quarters was denominated within US dollars.  Second, international banks have lent about $3.One trillion as of mid-2014, mainly in dollars, to such companies. 

    Borio, the head of the monetary and economic department of the BIS, had been quoted on the news wires saying that "Should the US dollar, the dominant international currency, carry on its ascent, this could expose currency and funding mismatches by raising debt burdens.  The related tightening of financial conditions could only worsen once rates of interest in the US normalize."

    Moreover, an increase in forex borrowing preceded the Latina American debt crisis of the late 1970s and early 1980s.  It presaged Mexico’s Tequila Turmoil in 1994-1995. An increase in hard forex borrowing also took place within the run-up to the Asian financial crisis within 1997-1998.  

    According to the BIS data, overseas lending rose by 400 bln in Q2 2014 to surpass $30 trillion.  The fir.2% increase in the year from mid-2013 had been the first increase since the late-2011.  Not even close to being part of the solution (through the internationalization of the yuan), China is part of the problem.  BIS figures indicate that outstanding loans by international banks in order to Chinese businesses doubled in the 18 months to mid-2014 to $1.1 trillion.   

    The low level of US interest rates, and the dirty peg that keeps the yuan shadowing the US buck, made it attractive for Chinese companies to borrow dollars.  The actual currency mismatch may not be as large as it is for companies from other emerging market economies with a freer exchange price regime.  However, the 3.8% dollar appreciation of against the yuan within first four months of this 12 months was sufficient to wipe out more than a year of the interest rate cost savings.  Even now, the dollar is about 2% higher against the yuan than it was at the beginning of the year.  The difference between your US and China’s prime rates are about 225 bp annualized.  

    The fact that set exchange regimes have largely been jettisoned (with the notable exception of Hong Kong and OPEC countries), the chance of a repeat of the earlier emerging market crises tend to be perceived to have lessened.  The greater flexibly currency regime does not prevent the kind of currency mismatch that has resulted in past crises.  It is true that lots of emerging market economies have amassed large reserves of hard currencies.  These reserves can be employed to resist a forex decline or address an industry imbalance.  Precisely how they can be used for a private sector currency or funding mismatch is less instantly clear. 

    What the various crises over the past 40 years or so have in common is a currency or maturity mismatch that was accelerated just prior to the start of the crisis.  The  fairly low US interest rates relative to domestic rates available in rising market economies, and the depreciation of the dollar, which was broadly seen in structural rather cyclical conditions, encouraged such behavior.  This worked until the dollar and US interest rates rose.  

    Many experts put the onus on the Federal Reserve.  When it eased policy using orthodox and then unorthodox guidelines to avoid a harder downturn, critics say it should not have done so.  It was exporting deflation.  Because it prepared investors for the end of its unorthodox measures, some have complained the US is actually exporting inflation.  

    The Federal Reserve is not the central bank for the world, but of the United States.  Still, it recognizes its importance.  This had revealed its motives to investors months before it was going to slow its asset purchases.  It even waited a few months after it experienced appeared to signal the beginning of it’s tapering.  It has been warning investors since the beginning of the year that after an unspecified “considerable period” after the long-term asset purchase plan was completed, it might raise US interest rates.  The actual clearest signal from the Fed’s leadership is that this process will likely begin around the middle associated with next year.  Of course, it is dependent on the data but barring a substantial surprise, those with potential financing or currency mismatches, have just as much warning as can reasonably be expected.    

    Meanwhile, China’s yuan swap lines go unused.  The yuan may be a lot of things, but it is not an international funding currency.

    BIS Quarterly Report Shows China’s Exchange Lines Misunderstood is republished with permission from Marc to Market

  • Australia to China: We (may) Choose You

    Australia to China: We (may) Choose You

    Australia's new prime minister may choose Asian ideals over the U.S.

    There has been speculation that Australia’utes recent change in prime minister from Tony Abbott to Malcolm Turnbull will mean a shift in Australia’s choice of partners in Asia. The change does not mean that Australia will now ‘choose’ China over the United States. However, it could change what Australia strategies by its ‘choice’ of the United States.

    In choosing the United States, Tony Abbott meant American ideals and its powerful military. With regard to Abbott the success and balance of Asia — and in turn Australia’utes success and stability — was due to US economic as well as military power. In his view, the norms, institutions, and niceties of the regional environment were largely a useful fig leaf. Sometimes they helped, but they could never replace the real basis of regional security — United States power.

    Abbott concerned that Beijing’s military spending and assertive behaviour had been directly challenging Washington’s military authority. A lacklustre and aloof Whitened House compounded this. As a way to encourage the United States to regain its confidence, Abbott sought to build up Australia’s military capabilities as well as reach out to fellow US allies.

    Most notably, preparations were in position for a historic deal to purchase Japanese submarines. There was even mention by loose-lipped Australian and Japoneses officials of the A-word (alliance). That may not have been the direct ambition, but the path towards a common security relationship was definitely an option if the United States didn’t seek to reassert itself in the region.

    For the new Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, to choose the United States way to embrace American ideas and also the regional order it has helped build in Asia. With regard to Turnbull this order has a value in its own right that is distinct from the specific capabilities of the US government.

    In Turnbull’s view, the United States is a vital player in a regional order, as opposed to the sun around which the program revolves. Emerging powers may become threats and challengers, but their growth is not automatically a risk. The more these states embrace the norms of the region, such as free markets and peaceful dispute resolution through the WTO or the UN, the less their development is a concern.

    Power still matters to Turnbull. He is fond of quoting Thucydides’ famous Melian dialogue. As he said in a recent interview, ‘the strong do the things they will and the weak suffer as they must … That is what the whole international order is designed to quit — to ensure that there is a rules-based approach to international relations, and it’s necessary for stand up for that’.

    Turnbull sees exactly the same concerns about power-based struggles within Asia as his predecessor did — particularly in the South The far east Sea. Both men would agree Thucydides captured the long lasting impulse by strong states to dominate. However, where Tony Abbott believed the only way to react was through deterrence by a stronger state, Australia’s brand new leader seems to believe we are able to overcome this challenge through a wider range of means. With the right institutions, norms and methods of international politics in place, the region can prevent strong states from aggressively pursuing their interests to the hindrance of weaker states. At least curb the worst extravagances of such behaviour.

    As prime minister, Turnbull continues to ensure Australia remains a close ally of the United States. Washington’s energy remains the best way to re-enforce and support the system, helping to keep changes within the existing order, rather than against it. However, simply because power and order aren’t synonymous for Turnbull, there are areas where what is good for the US may not be good for the region (which would be an oxymoron in Abbott’s globe).

    Therefore, Turnbull will seek to more obviously distinguish American interests through those of Australia and those from the wider region. He is likely to be more welcoming of endeavours such as the Asia Infrastructure Expense Bank, an initiative that split his predecessor’s cupboard in two. Likewise, he will wish to continue to build links along with states who can support the local order, with less regard for whether they are All of us allies. Therefore, New Zealand was Malcolm Turnbull’s first official go to, a country with similar ideas and concerns to Australia, but who famously abandoned the united states alliance in the mid-1980s.

    None of this would be to suggest Australia will ever ‘choose’ China over the US. Nevertheless, its change in leadership will change the implication of ‘choosing’ america. According to the former leader Tony a2z Abbott, US power was what mattered. According to the new Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, the order the United States built has a value in its own right, one that might still stand, even as US power declines.

    Australia has had four prime ministers in the last four years. None has had a substantial impact on the direction associated with national foreign policy. Architectural factors and a heavy bipartisan straightjacket constrain innovation and debate. Nevertheless, the latest change in leadership will suggest a slight re-evaluation of the hierarchy and meaning of key factors within the national policy mix.

    This is unlikely to cause much change in the short term. In the medium to long term — should Turnbull last that long — the change may lead Australia towards a more regional and order-centric approach.

    Will a Turnbull government mean a new foreign policy for Australia? is republished with authorization from East Asia Forum

  • Tremendous Currency Movement from the end of Last Year into the New Year

    Tremendous Currency Movement from the end of Last Year into the New Year

    Currency movement was dramatic from the end of 2014 to present.

    The US dollar turned in a mixed performance during the first week of the New Year.  It fell against the Antipodeans and yen but rose against the other main currencies. The dollar’s performance against emerging market currencies had been similarly mixed.  It flower against most but fell against the major non-restricted currencies, like the Turkish lira, the Mexican peso, and the Southern African rand.  Most importantly, the buck finished the week on a gentle note, and we expect this to continue into the week forward. 

    US job creation in Dec, at 252k, surpassed consensus anticipations.  Upward revisions for the October-November rolls were by a combined 50k.  It had been the weakest monthly jobs growth since August.  The actual wage data were a major disappointment. Average hourly revenue fell 0.2%.   The consensus called for a 0.2% increase.  The 0.4% gain in The fall of revision cut the number in half.  The year-over-year pace slumped to 1.7%, the lowest in two-years.  

    The market’s confidence that the Fed’s lift-off will take place near mid-year has been shaken.  The implied yield of the December 2015 Eurodollar futures contract finished the week at it’s lowest level in a month, almost 20 bp below the level seen on Christmas Event.  In the week ahead, much softer retail sales and inflation gauges will likely favor the actual doves and weigh on the buck.  

    Technically, the euro could climb toward $1.1875-$1.1900 before the has make a new stand in front of the January 22 ECB meeting.  This sort of gain off the multi-year low set on January 8 near $1.1755 does not likely reflect bottom-pickers and discount hunters as much as a minor round of short covering as the downside momentum appeared to ease.  A break of the $1.1750 are could signal another quick penny decline.  

    The dollar peaked one month ago against the yen (Dec 8 ~JPY121.85).  Since then the actual BOJ has added another (approximately) 1.4% of GDP to the balance sheet.  Over the past 30 days, the dollar appears to be carving out some kind of wedge or even triangle pattern, which is a continuation pattern.  The downward sloping top line is drawn off that December 8 high which the high from January 2-3.  It comes in near JPY120.35 by the end of a few days ahead.  The upward sloping bottom line is off the December 16 low spike below JPY115.60 and also the January 6 low simply above JPY118.00.  It shut just above it prior to the weekend.  On a downside split, which looks likely, we initially target JPY117.50 after which JPY116.80.  

    After a string associated with disappointing PMI reports, the UK surprised investors with its biggest jump in manufacturing output within seven months and the smallest trade deficit since 06 2013.  Sterling’s downside momentum had carried to just above $1.50 and the data helped encourage a bounce.  Those upticks nevertheless lack conviction, and the short covering was only sufficient for this to flirt with $1.5175. Officially, there is potential into the $1.5250-$1.5300 area.  Expectations of a rate hike continue to push out, reflected in the latest gains in the short-sterling futures contract.  A sub-1% CPI reading is expected on January Thirteen and will likely push the market more in this direction.  

    The Australian dollar finished last week over its 20-day moving average for the first time since mid-November.  Positive fundamental information from the smaller than expected industry deficit and larger than expected jump in building approvals appeared to stall the downside momentum.  This took the broader US dollar weakness to drive it higher.  It probed the actual $0.8200 area and the next level of resistance is actually near $0.8250.  From a technical perspective, the Australian dollar looks the most constructive of the foreign currencies we look from here.  The RSI and MACDs possess turned up, the 5-day moving typical is poised to mix above the 20-day average, and it shut at three-week highs before the weekend break.  It also closed above the downtrend collection drawn off the mid- and late-November levels and the high at the start of the New Year.

    The technical tone of the Canadian dollar is not nearly as good as it is for the Australian buck.  The Canadian dollar is more like a petro-currency.  This allowed the actual drop in oil prices in order to overshadow the 53.5k begin full-time jobs reported before the weekend break.  The US dollar extended its advancing streak against the Canada dollar to six consecutive days.  It approached CAD1.19 prior to pulling back a little. Above there, the CAD1.1975-CAD1.2000 offers psychological resistance.  The lower degree is equivalent to $0.8350 for Canadian businesses.  

    Oil prices have fallen with regard to seven consecutive weeks.  The risk is still on the downside, although the February WTI futures contract spent most the week bouncing along the recent trough.  Saudi Arabia’s last move, to chop the discounts offered in the US and Europe, demonstrate it’s resolve to preserve share of the market.  At the same time, the apparent liberalization people rules on condensate exports could increase US exports by another million barrels a day by the end of the year, according to some industry estimates.  This will intensify the competition within third markets.  Over time, the actual decline in prices will boost demand. There are already original signs that the decline within gasoline prices in the US is boosting demand.  

    The drop in essential oil prices, the absence of earnings development in the jobs report, and the increased jitters in the equity market, ahead of Q4 earnings season pushed US 10-year bond produces below 2.0%.  This is beginning to look like the upper end of yields.  Yields recorded a low near 1.86% in the mid-October expensive crash and 1.88% on January 6.  A break could extend the range another Ten bp or so initially, but there’s increasing talk of a move toward 1.50%.  

    The S&P Five hundred filled the gap from the higher opening on December Eighteen that we anticipated.  The recuperation off the January 6 low was sharp.  In some ways, it looks similar to the middle of October and middle of Dec lows.  However, the specialized indicators, like the RSI and MACDs aren’t as constructive.  A break of the 2030-2065 range will likely suggest the actual direction of the near-term trend.  Even though the weekly close was over the 50-day moving average, on balance we have a slight near-term bias to the downside.  

    Observations based on the speculative placement in the futures market: 

    1.  There were two significant changes in yucky speculative position in the futures markets in the Commitment of Traders for the week finishing January 6.  The gross short euro position elevated by 11.6k contracts to 207.1k.  The gross short sterling placement grew by 10.4k to 64.7k contracts.  There was only one other gross position adjustment more than 5k contracts.  It was the 7.7k contract cut of gross long Australian buck positions to leave 17k.  

    2.  There was a clear pattern.  Speculators added to the gross short position of all currency futures we track.  The longs were combined but were added to within the euro, yen, sterling and peso.  

    3.  It appears as if there was some pre-holiday position squaring, and those positions are being re-established.  The actual gross short euro position peaked in early November near 239k contract and fell to 183k in the middle of December.  There are a few exclusions.  The gross long and short yen positions are smaller now than mid-December, but the net position is little changed at 90.1k contracts short. Before Christmas, it was at 87k.  The market has been creating a larger net short sterling position, which is now about 20% larger than it was on before Xmas.  At 64.5k contracts, the net short peso position is about twice the size of the position at the end of The fall of.  

    4.  The net short 10-year Treasury note commodity position slipped to 243k agreements from 261k the prior week.  Nevertheless, this is still a large increase from the 163k net short placement in early December.  The yucky long position rose nearly 30k contracts over the past week in order to 311.5k.  In late October, the gross long position was 457k connections and fell to 273k agreements in the middle of December.  It has increased for the past three weeks.  The yucky short position increased by almost 12k contracts to 554.7k.  This is actually the largest gross short risky position since 2006.  It has grown by about 90k agreements since the end of November.

    News Stream May Favor All of us Doves and Spur Dollar Consolidation is republished with permission from Marc to Market

  • India is on the Outside of the TPP Looking In

    India is on the Outside of the TPP Looking In

    India's economic cost of TPP exclusion can only be estimated.

    The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreed to on Five October 2015 covers almost a third of world trade as well as 40 percent of global GDP. Through not being part of the TPP, India dangers losing out. According to a Focus on Global Trade and Investment study, India’s nominal GDP is likely to trim by a lot more than 1 percent because of trade and investment diversion caused by the actual TPP. The ensuing negative effects upon India’s economy by way of income and job losses will be large.

    India’s integration into the global economy is under China’s, also excluded from the TPP. India has a share of only 2.1 percent in worldwide trade (five times less than China’utes) and cannot do with further industry diversion. One reason for China’utes current clout is it’s active integration into the global economy over recent decades. Today it leads exports as well as foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows. If India wants to grow in order to such economic and geopolitical levels, it must practice better plug-in.

    Global supply chains make up 80 percent of international trade these days. The TPP will further heighten this trend, as it may link production facilities across edges. Joining the TPP could help Indian integrate its small and medium-sized businesses into these production networks. Indian exports are most likely to take a hit because the TPP provides special concessions to some of its key partners to purchase from other TPP member countries. The United States, for instance, consumes thirty percent of Indian native textiles exports, and will come under stress, as competitors such as Vietnam will be in a position to usurp India’s market share on the back of benefits given under the TPP.

    FDI inflows into India began to pick up from the mid-2000s. Today India is one of the largest recipients of FDI in the developing world and the biggest in South Asia. The TPP will incentivise foreign investment among member states, decreasing the relative attractiveness of India as a location among TPP members. Given it’s potential to create jobs and help build infrastructure, India is not in a position to forego potential FDI inflows.

    The TPP also involves regulatory harmonisation, meaning that multi-national companies under the aegis of the TPP do not have to encounter regulatory hostilities in host countries or grapple with different laws. India’s legislations do not line up with global standards and companies have previously encountered retrospective tax regulations. In this context, a TPP that excludes India is not good news for the country.

    However, despite it’s benefits, India cannot easily agree to several measures under the TPP. India, along with other developing nations, will find it difficult to give within on environmental standards due to its lower stage of economic development. Likewise, India will have a hard time conceding to the kind of intellectual property legal rights protection regime that the United States wants, as it relies on a huge generic drug manufacturing business. In addition, India cannot afford to sign up in sweeping tariff cuts expected under the TPP. It will also be near on impossible to meet the labour requirements of the developed West.

    However, India should aim to negotiate upon these issues. Staying out of the TPP doesn’t help in either economic terms or foreign policy terms.

    Even more significant are the geopolitical implications from the trade deal. The TPP is really a well-crafted geo-economic exercise as much as it is a industry and investment pact. It has been successful in excluding China as well as thereby potentially stunting its fast rise. While studies show the United States would gain marginally in economic terms using the implementation of the TPP, Washington offers clearly gained a geopolitical victory. Its motivations are understandable, as it may want to regain it’s leadership over global financial governance mechanisms after this lost some credibility following the 2008 financial crisis and the emergence of powerful new groups like the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, Indian, China, and South Africa).

    India needs to deftly navigate the TPP waters by making sure it does not isolate itself by staying out of the picture for too long. At the same time, actively investing in the TPP will be hard. Indian should pursue an incremental process, where it initially joins the discussions after which determines how well it is to go in as a member. India might bring much needed flexibility to the TPP and use it to boost its own ties with United States.

    However, there is no clear consensus in the Indian federal government on whether enhanced market access through the TPP will be well worth the gains. The TPP would involve huge costs to a few protected Indian industries. Undoubtedly, Indian would need to prepare itself for higher standards than it offers ever committed to in the past. Nevertheless, the gains for India if it joins the TPP cannot be ignored.

    Ultimately, major structural changes in the actual Indian economy — from infrastructural overhauls as well as legislative fixes to institutional changes and human resource development — will determine whether India manages to succeed in an enormous amount of complex supply chain-led international industry and investment. Mega-FTAs are only enablers. India should partake in them according to its needs at the time.

    India’utes TPP dilemma is republished with permission from East Asia Forum

  • China's Possible Population Problems

    China's Possible Population Problems

    China scraps its one-child policy, but is it too late?

    The long-anticipated abolition of China's one-child policy is a first step in the right path. However, they can do a lot more.  In the West, the criticism of the one-child policy is that it is a "vicious Communist strategy." In reality, most competitors of that policy were Marxists and the idea itself came from free airline.

    Overpopulation or old population?

    Like in most countries, the birth price in China began to drop with industrialization and urbanization. In the Mao era, the crude birth price almost halved from Thirty seven to 20 per thousand, while infant mortality declined by over 75 percent. In the process, life expectancy almost doubled to Sixty six years in 1948-76, while population grew from 540 million to 940 million.

    In the 1960s and 70s, birth planning was seen as a solution to China's economic problems and the slogan was "later, longer, fewer," later marriages, longer spaces in between children, and fewer of them.

    While Mao's view was that population growth could empower the nation, Deng Xiaoping favored reducing population growth. However, even Deng advocated a goal, not a specific policy measure.

    During a 1978 international conference, cybernetics expert Song Jian met Dutch theorists who had led to the then-famous Club of Rome report, Limits to Growth. Based on modeling, it forecast a catastrophe if globe population would not be limited.

    Based upon these assumptions (which were discredited later), Song's own projections recommended that, without birth price limitations, China's population might explode. The seemingly "scientific" ideas appealed to many in The far east, which had coped with years of ideological excess.

    As several Marxist theorists opposed Song'utes ideas, one of these critics, Lian Zhongtang, argued that "one-childization" could impose serious social costs upon the peasants. Nevertheless, they adopted the actual one-child policy in 1979.

    Not a one-size-fits-all policy

    Ever since then, the policy has been widely criticized in the West. Yet, the brand new policy, initially designed like a one-generation measure, did not fully materialize in practice in China.

    First of all, the policy allowed many exclusions and ethnic minorities had been exempt. In accordance with China's yes action policies toward ethnic minorities, they usually allowed the second to have two children within urban areas and 3-4 in rural areas. In turn, ethnic Han people living in rural towns could have two children.

    Until the 2010s, only a third of China's population was subject to a rigid one-child restriction. More than half of the Chinese language could have a second child if the first child was a woman.

    Finally, policy enforcement was not through Beijing, but at the provincial degree. As a result, enforcement varied and some provinces relaxed the limitations. For instance, after Henan's coverage relaxation, majority of the provinces and cities permitted two mother and father who came from one-child families to possess two children.

    Toward a new policy

    In earlier 2013, I argued which Chinese population trends were at a crossroads. A year before, the working-age population (15-59 years) registered a decline, dropping by 3.5 million to 937 million. I believed that China needs a brand new demographic future because the conclusion of population policy changes takes years and China's economic growth is becoming reliant on human capital.

    The first policy alter came in November 2013, when China relaxed its one-child policy. Now families could have 2 children if one parent had been an only child. In practice, the revision applied mainly to urban couples, since there were few rural one-child households.

    Nevertheless, while 11 million partners in China could have a second child, barely one million partners applied to have a second child in 2014, less than half the expected figure of 2 million each year. Only half of eligible couples wished to have two children, mostly because of the costs associated with the 2nd child.

    That led the government in order to abolish the one-child policy within October 2015, allowing all families to have two children. The new objective is to cope with a maturing population and "to improve the balanced development of population."

    More changes needed

    Population growth rate in China actually peaked at 2.8 % in the mid-1960s. By 1981, it halved to 1.4 percent and today it is close to 0.4 %. In the process, median age has almost doubled from Twenty two years to almost 36 years. To cope with such trends, they require much more.

    • China could consider "pro-natalist" policies that support human reproduction with incentives (a one-time baby bonus, child benefit payments or tax reductions, paid maternity and paternity leave, etc).

    • China can promote pro-growth guidelines by raising the retirement, increasing the share of the working force, and accelerating retraining.

    • China could contain cruel conventional cultural norms, such as son-preference bias, which continue to prevail, whilst casting a dark shadow over the realization of women'utes true potential.

    • While the come back of high-skilled Chinese Diaspora is already promoted, along with green card schemes to foreign talent, China could accelerate more comprehensive skill-based immigration.

    Like many other economies, China needs fewer old individuals, more women, and young people. What makes China different is not the kind of demographic challenges it has to cope with, but their magnitude – which is a legacy of the one-child policy.

    Unlike most countries, however, China'utes government has a more consequential role in the economy. Beijing might seize that role and push bold policy experiments as long as they emulate the wishes of the Chinese people and long-term growth prospects.

    China's Demographic Long term is republished with permission from The Difference Group